Disposed

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Oct 2019CWJC/16523/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a compulsorily retired Revenue Clerk, sought payment of unpaid salary for a period during which he allegedly performed duties while suffering from hepatitis. The court directed the Circle Officer to decide the claim for arrears of salary within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to let the Circle Officer take a decision on the petitioner's claim for payment of arrears of salary within three months.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16523 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Santosh Kumar, Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Singh, Resident of VillageAnandbag Karpi, P.O. and P.S.-Karpi, District-Arwal

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Commissioner Magadh Division, Gaya

¶9

The District Officer Jehanabad

¶10

The Deputy Collector Incharge, Establishment Section, Collectoriate, Jehanabad

¶11

The Additional Collector cum Enquiry Officer Jehanabad

¶12

¶13

The Circle Officer, Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad

¶14

The Circle Inspector, namely Prem Kumar, Circle Office, Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad

¶15

The Nazir, namely Shambhu Prasad Verma, Circle Office, Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

3 14-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

The petitioner was a Revenue Clerk in

¶23

Makhdumpur Circle Office in the district of Jehanabad. He was compulsorily retired from service with effect from 11.12.2014. It is his case that his salary for certain period, during which he had discharged his duties, has not been paid. He had remained absent from duty for a considerable period of time, according to

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.16523 of 2019(3) dt.14-10-2019 2/2

¶25

the petitioner, because he was suffering from hepatitis.

¶26

The petitioner has approached the Circle Officer,

¶27

Makhdumpur by making representation for payment of salary, which, according to him, has remained unpaid though the petitioner had discharged his duties.

¶28

Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is disposed of with a direction that let a decision be taken by the Circle Officer, Makhdumpur on the petitioner’s claim for payment of his arrears of salary within a period of three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

¶29

Writ application stands disposed of with the observation aforesaid.

¶30

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶31

Rajesh/-

¶32

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumeshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Yugeshar Yadav @ Yugeshwar Yadav @ Jugeshar Yadav @ Yugesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ifat Fatima Vs The State of Bihar