Disposed

Premlata Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC12 Apr 2019CWJC/14651/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14651 of 2018, disposed of a writ application regarding the Bihar State Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016, granting liberty to pursue statutory remedy with condonation of delay considerations.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed off with liberty to seek statutory remedy and condition on condonation of delay.

Premlata Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14651 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Premlata Kumari Daughter of Mahendra Sah, Wife of Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Resident of Village- Bhelabinda, Panchayat- Baijala, P.S.- Jhajha, DistJamui.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food & Civil Supply Department, Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Food and Supply Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Jamui cum Chairman of Selection Committee, Jamui.

¶9

The District Supply Officer, Jamui.

¶10

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jamui.

¶11

The Block Supply Officer, Jhajha, Jamui.

¶12

Doli Kumari, W/o Rajendra Sah, R/v- Bhalbinda, P.O.- Karahara, Panchayat- Baijala, P.S.- Jhajha, Dist- Jamui.

¶13

... ... Respondents

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 12-04-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this application may be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy by way of statutory appeal in accordance with the provisions contained in the Bihar State Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016.

¶16

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the petitioner pursuing her remedy in accordance with law.

¶17

In the given facts and circumstance, this writ application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to seek

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.14651 of 2018(2) dt.12-04-2019 2/2

¶19

her remedy in accordance with law.

¶20

In case any question of limitation arises in pursuing the statutory remedy and the application for condonation of delay is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall consider the same keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner was pursuing her remedy before this Court.

¶21

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶22

avin/-

¶23

Premlata Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Premlata Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandni Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Irshad Alam Vs The General Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited B P C L and Ors.

Gyan Jyoti Gramouthan Samiti Through Its Secretary Jitendra Kumar Pandey and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Pd. Mishra Vs Shree Arun Yadav and Anr.