Disposed

Mukesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Mar 2019CWJC/1465/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order disposed of a writ petition complaining about the dilapidated condition of the Prabhakar Puskararni Sarowar at Hajipur. The Court directed the District Magistrate, Vaishali, to consider the grievance and take steps to restore the structure if the complaint was valid.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Magistrate, Vaishali to consider the petitioner's grievance and take steps to restore the Prabhakar Puskararni Sarowar if the complaint is valid.

Mukesh Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1465 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mukesh Ranjan, Son of Braj Kishore Mishra, Resident of House No. 18, Gali No.01, Shahi Colony, P.S.- Hajipur, District Hajipur at Vaishali.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through

¶7

Aayukt Tirhut Parmandal, Muzaffarpur

¶8

IInd Appellate Authority, “Zila Padhadhikari, Vaisahli.

¶9

Zila Lok Shiykyat Nivaran Padhadhikari, Hajipur.

¶10

Anumandal Lok Shivkayat Padhadhikari.

¶11

Karyapalak Padhadhikari, Nagar Parishad, Hajipur.

¶12

... ... Respondents

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Bharti, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, AC to GA 2 For the Respondent No.6 : Mr. Kumar Manish, Adv.

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and

¶17

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶18

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶19

2 15-03-2019 Heard the parties.

¶20

The petitioner complains that ‘the Prabhakar Puskararni Sarowar’ situated at Kargil Campus, Civil Court Hajipur is in a bad shape and despite the orders being issued by different authorities for cleaning ‘the Sarowar’ and for its restoration to its original shape, no follow up steps have been taken.

¶21

Mr. Kumar Manish, learned Counsel appears for the ‘Karyapalak Padhadhikari’, Nagar Parishad, Hajipur to submit

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.1465 of 2018(2) dt.15-03-2019 2/2

¶23

that since ‘the Sarowar’ is situated within the Civil Court Campus, it would be the duty of the Public Works Department, Government of Bihar to do the needful.

¶24

In the circumstances and for the present, we would direct the District Magistrate, Vaishali to consider the grievance of the petitioner and take all possible steps for disposal thereof and in case the complaint made by the petitioner is correct then to take consequential steps for getting ‘the Prabhakar Puskararni Sarowar’ restored to its proper condition.

¶25

With the observations above, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶26

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶27

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶28

Archana/ Surendra/-

¶29

Mukesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikh Intellectual Forum, Bihar Through Its Honarary General Secretary, Dr. Surjit Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Birchandra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Uday kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

The Bauram Gram Vikash Samiti and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kaushlendra Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anup Rai Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.