Disposed

Ram Pravesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Feb 2019CWJC/12894/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, absorbed in ICDS post-dissolution of Bihar Agriculture Market Board, sought Assured Career Progression benefits. Court disposed of writ petition directing District Programme Officer to pass a reasoned decision within three months, ensuring payment within one month if dues are admissible.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.4 to decide the claim for ACP benefits by a reasoned order within three months and pay admissible dues within one month thereafter.

Ram Pravesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12894 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Pravesh Rai Son of Sri Ram Briksh Rai Resident of Village-Dayalpur, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department , Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The District Programme Officer Patna

¶9

The Child Development Officer, Masaurdhi, Patna

¶10

The Administrator, Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board Dissolved, Pant Bhawan, Patna. ... Respondents

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, AC to GP 3 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 13-02-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

¶17

It is submitted by petitioner’s counsel that subsequent to the dissolution of the Bihar Agriculture Market Board. petitioner has been absorbed in the Integrated Child Development Services at Masaurhi, Patna. He submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefits of Assured Career Progression on account of decision of the erstwhile Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board contained in office letter dated 16.7.2015. For such claim, he has also filed a representation (Annexure 7) before the District Programme Officer, Patna (respondent no.4).

¶18

Since, decision regarding petitioner’s entitlement is to

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.12894 of 2016(2) dt.13-02-2019 2/2

¶20

be taken by respondent no.4, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

¶21

Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4 to take a final decision on the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefits under the ACP in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order positively within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

It is made clear that if any dues is found admissible and payable to the petitioner, the same should be paid within one months thereafter.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶24

Shashi

¶25

Ram Pravesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Om Prakash Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Binodanand Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajit Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nagendra Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.