Appellant sought writ relief. Court allowed withdrawal of the writ application with liberty to move a revision before the appellate authority and disposed of the matter. No substantive legal issue was addressed in this order.
Permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to move in revision before the appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12860 of 2019
======================================================
Vinod Kisku aged about 41 years (Male), S/o Late Charlis Kisku, Resident of Village-Bamdah,P.s. Chandramandi,Dist.Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anujit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.U.P. Singh, AC to SC4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 23-09-2019 After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner seek permission to withdraw this application with a
liberty to move in revision before the appellate authority.
Permission is granted.
This Writ Application is disposed off as withdrawn
with the liberty as prayed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/-
U
Vinod Kisku
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Jamui
The Sub Divisional Officer, Jamui
The Block Development Officer, Chakai, Jamui
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
