Disposed

Manav Gopal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC16 Aug 2019CWJC/10700/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph oral order disposed of a writ petition where the respondent Board admitted granting additional marks and decided to award a laptop and other benefits for the petitioner's extra-ordinary academic achievement.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Board to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of Laptop and other admissible benefits within one month.

Manav Gopal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10700 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Manav Gopal Son of Sri Ravi Bhushan Sharma,Through his natural Guardian/Father namely Ravi Bhushan Sharma Son o Resident of VillageJhakhara, P.S. Pipra Kothi, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

Principal Secretary Cum Secretary to the Government, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna

¶8

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

¶10

¶11

Director, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

¶12

Examination Controller, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratan Kumar, Advocate For the BSEB : Mr.Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Binita Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG-15 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 16-08-2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶18

counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

¶19

In view of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent- Bihar School Examination Board (‘the Board’ for short) admitting 04 additional marks to the petitioner and improvement in the position of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Board to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of Laptop and other admissible benefits which is admitted by the respondents as

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.10700 of 2018(4) dt.16-08-2019 2/2

¶21

admissible for extra-ordinary achievement in the examination conducted by the Board.

¶22

The Court hope and trust that the Board will take corrective measures and grant the benefit of Lap-top and other admissible benefits which is admitted by the respondents as a matter of policy to be awarded to the extra-ordinary students on account of academic achievement in the examination. The Board shall take appropriate decision for grant of Lap-top and other admissible benefits to the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶23

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

spandey/-

¶26

Manav Gopal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manav Gopal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pravesh Kumar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Niraj Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janki Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Soni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Managing Committee Of Madarsa Faridul Banat Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arti Kumari @ Arti Kumari Poddar @ Arti Gandhi Vs The Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University Through Its Registrar and Ors.