In a civil writ petition, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the application had become infructuous and was sought to be withdrawn. The Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10296 of 2016
======================================================
Aditya Raj, S/o Shyam Bihari Singh, R/o Mohalla- Kuraich, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA
ORAL ORDER
2/ 19-04-2019 Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this application
has, now, become infructuous. Therefore, he wants to withdraw the present application.
In view of such, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
J. Alam/-
U
Aditya Raj
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Bihar
Chief Conservator of Forest Bihar
District Magistrate Rohtas
Authorized Officer Cum Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas
District Forest Officer, Rohtas
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
