Oral order dismissing a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, as the court found the ingredients of the offence clearly attracted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.954 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2015 Thana- BARAHIYA District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Om Prakash Maharaj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
quashing the FIR of Barahiya P.S. Case No. 101 of 2015 registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act of 2003.
On perusal of the FIR as contained in Annexure-2 to
the present writ petition, I find that ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity Act are clearly attracted.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.954 of 2016(3) dt.04-01-2019 2/2
In that view of the matter, I see no merit in this writ
petition. It is dismissed accordingly.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md. S/SKSuman.
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for quashing the FIR under the Electricity Act has merit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Singh and Ors.
The State of Bihar through D.G.P
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
