The High Court dismissed an oral criminal revision application as infructuous because the trial of the underlying case had already been concluded at the time of the filing.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.195 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2017 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran
======================================================
Imran Ansari @ Imran Hashmi Son of Muslim Miyan @ Md. Muslim Ansari Resident of Village - Through his Guardian namely- Nurjahan Khatun, Wife of Muslim Miyan @ Md. Muslim Ansari Resident of Village - Mahddipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
... ... Respondent/s
3 15-07-2019 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial of the case has already been concluded and hence the present application has become infructuous.
The application is dismissed as being infructuous.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U T
Imran Ansari @ Imran Hashmi
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
