Disposed

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Jul 2019CR. MISC./8394/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order extended the provisional bail of the petitioner for six months based on a mediated settlement. The court directed extension of bail upon deposit of Rs. 2,50,000 and return of ornaments, conditioned on abiding by the settlement terms.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail extended for six months, contingent upon payment of Rs. 2,50,000 and return of ornaments, with confirmation of bonds upon deposit.

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8394 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar, Son of Ram Janam Rai @ Ram Julum Rai, Resident of Village - Jitwarpur Nezamat, Ward no.4,

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Manisha Kumari Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar, and Daughter of Suresh Rai @ Congresia Rai, Resident of Village - Jitwarpur Nezamat, Ward. no - 4 , Present Resident of Village - kishanpur Khulakh, P.S.- Warisnagar, Distt.Samastipur

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 17-07-2019

¶15

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Samastipur Mahila P.S. Case No. 48 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Case is under Section 498-A of the IPC.

¶17

On appearance of the opposite party no. 2, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation & Reconciliation Center, vide order dated 23.04.2019. The report of Mediator is available on record at Flag “M” which disclosed that the dispute between the parties has been resolved on the terms of settlement mutually agreed upon between them, which is attached with the mediator’s report. The memorandum of agreement disclosed that apart from other conditions there is an agreement that the petitioner shall pay

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8394 of 2019(4) dt.17-07-2019 2/2

¶19

Rs.2,50,000/- to the opposite party no.2 within a period of six months and also return the ornaments and other articles.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have admitted the above facts.

¶21

Having heard both sides, considering the above facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, appear before the learned court below on 29.07.2019 and on that day, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 13.02.2019 shall be extended for a period of six months and during that period, once the total amount as agreed between the parties is deposited, his bail bonds shall be confirmed with the condition that both the parties will abide by the terms of agreement agreed upon them and at the same time, it is also expected that the opposite party no.2 shall also respect the terms and conditions of the agreement mentioned in the memorandum of agreement.

¶22

Let a copy of Mediator’s report along with terms of agreement be sent to the court concerned for needful.

¶23

With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of.

¶24

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

Sunil Shukla/-

¶26

U T

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar Through D. M. Darbhanga Vs Shailesh Kumar and Anr.

Yogendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunil Kumar Bharti Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rahul Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Bachchi Devi @ Buchchi Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Rajesh Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.