Allowed

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Mar 2019CR. MISC./79217/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging apprehended arrest arising from an FIR under IPC and POCSO Act, the court granted interim bail to the petitioner to be surrendered within six weeks, subject to furnishing sureties and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, bond Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79217 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Kumar son of Indradeo Kewat, Resident of village Fenagi, P.S. Tekari, District Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 01-03-2019 Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tekari P.S.Case no.283 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act.

¶12

Allegation against the petitioner is of trying to outrage the

¶13

modesty of minor niece of the informant.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that money of the petitioner was dues with the informant, who happens to be uncle of the victim and when he demanded the money scuffle took place, which will appear from para 34/35 of the case diary and later on he came to know that he has been implicated in the false and concocted case.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79217 of 2018(3) dt.01-03-2019 2/2

¶17

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Ist cum Special Judge POCSO Act, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S.Case No.283 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

With the aforesaid observation, this application is

¶19

allowed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

¶22

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotan Prasad @ Chhote Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Bagad Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Mani Tripathi @ Amit Mani Tripathi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Deepak Jha Vs The State of Bihar