Allowed

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2019CR. MISC./78925/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted bail to petitioner in liquor-related prosecution under IPC Sections 272, 273 and Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, citing false allegations and lack of ante- cedents, directing sureties and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions of non-offence, presence in court, and appearance as required.

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.78925 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2018 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar S/o Ram Naresh Yadav R/villPanch-ratan, P.S-Basopatti, Distt.-Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-01-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2018, in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 252/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that entire allegation against the petitioner is false and mischievous. In the F.I.R. it is not specifically mentioned that as to what exactly was being carried by the petitioner. It is hardly believable that 1800 bottles of liquour could be carried on motorcycles which the petitioner was riding along with other co-associates. He further submits that from plain perusal of the seizure list, it appears that there is no recovery from conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78925 of 2018(2) dt.24-01-2019 2/2

¶16

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances and vague nature of allegation, let the petitioner above-named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge 2nd-cum-Special Judge Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 252/2018, subject to the conditions:-

¶18

(1.) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or wife.

¶19

(2.) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(3.) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶22

vinita/- U T

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Das @ Sunil Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Das @ Uday Kumar @ Uday Kumar Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhedan Pasi Vs The State Of Bihar

Praduman Kumar @ Praduman Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Mehendra Khaira @ Mahedra Naiya Vs The State Of Bihar