Allowed

Deep Ranjan Kumar @ Radhey Shyam v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jan 2019CR. MISC./77050/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC. The petitioner claimed false implication and lack of recovery in the current case. The court directed release on bond with sureties and attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petritioner released on regular bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

Deep Ranjan Kumar @ Radhey Shyam Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.77050 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2018 Thana- DEWARIA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deep Ranjan Kumar @ Radhey Shyam Son of Ram Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Ramchandrapur, P.S.- Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-01-2019

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Deoriya P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation is regarding unknown accused persons having looted Rs.70,000/- from a bank.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since his antecedent is bad, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and the recovery stated to have been made by the Police is in connection with other case bearing Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 82 of 2018 and no recovery has been made in the present case much less any T.I. Parade has been held. It is submitted that the petitioner is languishing in custody since

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77050 of 2018(3) dt.18-01-2019 2/2

¶17

17.04.2018 in the present case and he is ready to abide by whatever conditions as may be imposed by this Court upon the petitioner.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Deoriya P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018.

¶19

It is further directed that the petitioner would mark his presence before the Officer In-Charge of the concerned Police Station at 10:30 A.M on each and every Monday of the week and on his defaults on two consecutive occasion to mark his attendance, the present privilege of regular bail shall stand cancelled automatically and the petitioner shall be taken into custody.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

S.Sb/-

¶22

U T

Deep Ranjan Kumar @ Radhey Shyam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deep Ranjan Kumar @ Radhey Shyam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Bigu Mahto @ Raghunath Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sajid Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Harihar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar