Dismissed

Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jan 2019CR. MISC./76830/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner applied for anticipatory bail in a liquor smuggling case. The Court dismissed the application as not maintainable due to lack of specific allegations against the petitioner, but directed surrender for regular bail consideration.

What did the court decide?

The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed, but the petitioner is directed to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail.

Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.76830 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2018 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal, S/o Albela Singh, R/o Village- Shivnar, P.S.Mokama, Barh, Dist- Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avanish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 11-01-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Mokama Police Station Case No. 206 of 2018, disclosing offence under Sections 30(a)/41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

¶15

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has attempted to convince this Court that even if the allegation, as made in the First Information Report, is considered to be true, no offence under the provisions of the Act is made out against this petitioner. Referring to the First Information Report, it is being submitted that allegedly, from an abondoned jeep, huge quantity of country-made liquor was recovered by the police on the basis

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76830 of 2018(2) dt.11-01-2019 2/2

¶17

of secret information. The name of the petitioner has cropped up on the basis of disclosure made by the local people. Over and above this, there is no allegation even to the extent that the local people disclosed that the articles, so recovered, belong to this petitioner.

¶18

Since this application is not maintainable, it is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶19

However, considering the nature of allegation in the First Information Report, it is directed that if the petitioner, Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal, surrenders before the Court below within four weeks from today and applies for regular bail, his application shall be considered on the same day on its own merit without being prejudiced by dismissal of the present application for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court.

¶20

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶21

ragini/-

¶22

U √ T √

Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramphal Singh @ Ramphal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vihar Private Unani Medical Colleges, Maulabagh (Maryam Masjid Gali) Vs The Union Of India Through Dr. Vaidya Rajesh Kotecha, Secretary, Ministry Of Ayurveda

Kishundev Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Digvijay Kumar @ Digvijay and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mani Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhawati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar