Ajmer @ Md. Ajmer v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that prayer for bail is rejected considering material surfaced during investigation. Trial court directed to conclude trial within nine months after completing formalities.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail rejected. Trial to be concluded within nine months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.76673 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2018 Thana- ISHIPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Ajmer @ Md. Ajmer son of Md. Jamil @ Sk. Jamil, Resident of Pirpainti Bazar, P.S.- Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 29-01-2019 Considering the material that has surfaced during the
investigation, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail, is hereby, rejected.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to bail considering material surfaced during investigation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajmer @ Md. Ajmer
- respondent
The State Of Bihar
Coram
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court