Allowed

Musharif Quireshi @ Sharib Ahmad @ Md. Sharif Quoraisi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2019CR. MISC./75963/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving theft under IPC Section 379. The court ordered enlargement on bail upon surrender within four weeks, citing that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail to surrender within four weeks and be enlarged upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties.

Musharif Quireshi @ Sharib Ahmad @ Md. Sharif Quoraisi Vs… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75963 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-639 Year-2018 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Musharif Quireshi @ Sharib Ahmad @ Md. Sharif Quoraisi, Son of Late Abdul Shakur 2 Phuna, Resident of Mohalla- Pratap Nagar, Derapur, P.S.Derapur, District- Kanpur, U.P.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-11-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for State.

¶13

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.639 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and all the allegations levelled against him are false, baseless and fabricated. Learned counsel submits that the name of this petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused.

¶15

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75963 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/3

¶17

the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it is the submission of the petitioner that his name has been involved in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, but the similarly situated coaccused namely Md. Shoib Quireshi @ Shoab Ahmad has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.22858 of 2019 and there is no opposition to this fact that the case of the petitioner is similarly situated, let the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.639 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

¶19

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶20

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75963 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 3/3

¶22

him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶23

(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India

¶24

without the previous permission of the Court.

¶25

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶26

arvind/-

¶27

U T

Musharif Quireshi @ Sharib Ahmad @ Md. Sharif Quoraisi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Musharif Quireshi @ Sharib Ahmad @ Md. Sharif Quoraisi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Innotech Educational Society Vs The State Bank of India

Neeraj Kumar Vs Bank of India

Anando Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Hareram Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Dalchand Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar