Partly allowed

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2019CR. MISC./7570/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Bailable Act, the petitioners were charged with murder and grievous hurt. The court rejected bail for one petitioner due to severity of charges but granted bail to the second petitioner on furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Bail for petitioner No. 1 rejected; Bailer for petitioner No. 2 directed with Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties.

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr. Vs The State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7570 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2018 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta S/o Keji Sah @ Kiji Sah Resident of Village - Rafipur, P.S- Hussainganj, District-Siwan.

¶5

Upendra Sah Keji Sha @ Kiji Sah Resident of Village - Rafipur, P.SHussainganj, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 23-04-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP

¶14

for the State.

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The prosecution case in brief is that while the informant along with his uncle reached near house of Jhulan Sah, the accused persons variously armed reached there and after a hot exchange of words, assaulted them, as a result of which, his uncle having received injuries, died in course of treatment.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner No. 2 has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7570 of 2019(3) dt.23-04-2019 2/2

¶19

The petitioners are in custody since 09-11-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no any circumstantial evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in the present case. So far petitioner No. 2 is concerned, there is no specific allegation of assault alleged against him.

¶20

On behalf of the State and the counsel for the informant, it is submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner No. 1 and co accused namely Anil and Banila of assaulting the deceased which led to his death.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner No. 1. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner No. 1 is rejected.

¶22

So far petitioner No. 2 named above is concerned, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 282 of 2018.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

A.K.V.//-

¶25

U T

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Govind Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Singh @ Raushan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Bholu Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Bin @ Surendra Bind @ Surendra Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Osiar Nonia Vs The State of Bihar