Allowed

Shubham Kumar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2019CR. MISC./74556/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition by two accused persons challenged in Naugachia P.S. Case examined their bail application in a murder and rioting case. The court allowed the bail petition subject to furnishing a bond and providing close relatives as sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the condition that both bailors are close relatives.

Shubham Kumar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.74556 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- NAUGACHIA District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shubham Kumar Yadav, son of Maha Nand Yadav

¶5

Shankar Yadav son of Sachchida Nand Yadav Both are Resident of VillageBalha Narayanpur, Police Station- Bhawanipur O.P., District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 22-02-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioners seek bail in Naugachia P.S. Case No. 116/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶13

It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence nine persons including these petitioners came on motorcycle and surrounded the father of informant. It is further alleged that three accused persons, namely, Brajesh Yadav, Chhabila Yadav @ Vikash Yadav and Sintu Yadav opened fire on the father of informant, who fell down after sustaining firearm injury.

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74556 of 2018(3) dt.22-02-2019 2/2

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is no allegation of making firing against these petitioners. Petitioners are alleged to be present on the spot.

¶16

The learned Sessions Judge has mentioned that postmortem report is available in para 125 of case diary. The doctor has opined cause of death firearm injury.

¶17

Petitioners are in custody since 04.05.2018.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 116/2018 , subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioners.

¶19

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶20

rakhi/-

¶21

U T

Shubham Kumar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubham Kumar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Sunit Chirai Mill Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Azad Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Jha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Uttim Singh @ Uttam Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar