Allowed

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Apr 2019CR. MISC./7312/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, and 120(B) IPC. The court noted the petitioner's custody since December 2018, lack of criminal antecedents, absence of tampering allegations, and vagueness of the prosecution's case regarding non-disclosure of amounts.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7312 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2018 Thana- PAUTHU District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Son of Rupan Singh Resident of Village- Safganj, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manish Kumar No2 ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 16-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 120(B) of the I.P.C.

¶14

Allegation is that the accused persons stopped the self help allowance to the beneficiaries by stopping the message of ‘no option’.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. A vague allegation has been made. There is no substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7312 of 2019(3) dt.16-04-2019 2/2

¶17

petitioner in the present case. No amount has been disclosed by the prosecution.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 12^th , Aurangabad in connection with Pauthu P.S. case No.85 of 2018.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav @ Manish kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anuj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mumtaz @ Md. Mataz Vs The State of Bihar

Amardeep Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar