The High Court refused bail to the petitioner, considering the nature of allegations, and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within nine months.
Bail prayer rejected; trial to conclude within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.72211 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2018 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran
====================================================== Akash Patel Son of Binda Patel, Resident of Village-Chanpatia, Police Station-Chanpatia, District-West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Senior Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Kumar Shrivastva For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 272 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 376, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67(a)(3) of the I.T. Act.
Considering the nature of allegation, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of bail is rejected. However, the Court below is directed to conclude the trial within a period of nine months.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mdrashid/-
U T
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Akash Patel
The State of Bihar
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
