Allowed

Sadanand Bahardar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2019CR. MISC./71758/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from Forbesganj PS Case No. 51 of 1992, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's application for bail after his surrender, directing his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount under specified conditions.

Sadanand Bahardar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71758 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-1992 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SADANAND BAHARDAR Son of Late Kushum Lal Bahardar Resident of Village-Bariyarpur, P.S-Narpatganj, District-Araria.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dinesh Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 13-12-2019 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in Forbesganj PS Case No. 51 of 1992, S.T. No. 132 of 2019 registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the IPC.

¶13

It is a case of misuse of privilege of bail on account of which the bail granted to the petitioner on 26.2.2009 was cancelled on 6.5.2016. Petitioner was declared absconder on 20.6.2018 and has surrendered on 13.2.2019 and since then he is in custody.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to communication gap petitioner was unaware and has bonafide reasons for not participating in the trial. It is submitted that he has voluntarily surrendered on 13.2.2019.

¶15

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions the petitioner’s prayer for bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71758 of 2019(4) dt.13-12-2019 2/2

¶17

each to the satisfaction of Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Araria in Forbesganj PS Case No. 51 of 1992, S.T. No. 132 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on

¶20

each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled.

¶21

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶22

SNkumar/-

¶23

U T

Sadanand Bahardar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadanand Bahardar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Junaid Shah Vs The State of Bihar

Bhagdev Roy Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjit Ray @ Ranjit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Indra Narayan Yadav @ Indra Nr. Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sheikh Irshad Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Ray Vs The State of Bihar