In an application for anticipatory bail, the Patna High Court rejected the petition. The court held that the case did not qualify as a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail.
The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 71425 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- KHIRI MORE District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
4 17-12-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP
for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection withKhiri More Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case No 26 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is a case of false implication and that due to extraneous considerations, on account of lodging of Khiri More PS Case No 19 of 2019 by the petitioners’ side, the informant has implicated the petitioners in the instant case.
The learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71425 of 2019(4) dt.17-12-2019 2/2
anticipatory bail referring the material in the case diary. It is submitted that the doctor has also found the injuries to be grievous in nature. The specific allegation on the petitioners is of assaulting by means of Khanti .
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The same is rejected.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in the pending criminal proceedings.
Whether the instant case is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Uday Yadav @ Uday Kumar @ Uday Yadav
Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
