Allowed

Chhote Lal Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Dec 2019CR. MISC./70743/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges under Sections 341/323/384/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging deprivation of liberty, false imprisonment, extortion, criminal intimidation, and harassment. The bail was granted subject to conditions including cooperation with the trial and furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail for 30 days if arrested or surrendering, upon furnishing bonds of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Chhote Lal Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70743 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2019 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Chhote Lal Sah S/o Late Thakur Sah Resident of Champa Nala Road, P.S.Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur

¶5

Vijay Sah S/o Chhote Lal Sah Resident of Champa Nala Road, P.S.Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 05-12-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case

¶15

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/384/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Title suit No.93 of 2016 is going on between Sachidanand Sah son of late Ganesh Sah, the informant and Smt. Jago Devi wife of petitioner Chhotelal Sah.

¶17

Allegation against the petitioner Vijay Sah is demand of ransom on mobile phone. When the petitioner went to the house of the petitioners they repeated their demand and took out Rs.2,000/- (Two thousand) from the pocket of the informant.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70743 of 2019(4) dt.05-12-2019 2/2

¶19

Submission is that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. A false and concocted allegation is there just to pressurize in the land dispute.

¶20

Finding substance in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Nathnagar Police Station Case No.343 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

Mkr./-

¶23

U T

Chhote Lal Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhote Lal Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Babloo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Dubey @ Ankit Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Lalbabu Thakur Vs the State of Bihar

Dulal Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Narayan Rai Vs The State of Bihar