Allowed

Ranjit Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Nov 2019CR. MISC./70070/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Patna granted bail to petitioners accused under IPC sections 304B, 201, and 34. Court found them released on conditions regarding bail bonds and sureties based on their non-involvement in the alleged dowry harassment charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 15th Muzaffarpur.

Ranjit Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70070 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2019 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANJIT MAHTO Son of Satyanarayan Singh @ Satyanarayan Mahto @ Satto Mahto Resident of Village - Sutihara Purwari Tola, P.S.- Mushahari, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Kiran Devi W/o Ranjit Mahto Resident of Village - Sutihara Purwari Tola, P.S.- Mushahari, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 18-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶14

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioners have never demanded any dowry nor tortured the victim. As a matter of fact, petitioners are separate in mess and business from the husband of the victim and they have no concerned with the affairs of the husband and wife. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners are in custody since

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70070 of 2019(2) dt.18-11-2019 2/2

¶18

13.06.2019.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 15^th Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 76 of 2019/G.R. No.1383/2019.

¶20

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶21

Ranjeet/-

¶22

U T

Ranjit Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Prasad Yadav @ Kamal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Thakur @ Rakesh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Ishwar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajvir Singh @ Ramesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar