Allowed

Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Nov 2019CR. MISC./68464/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prabhut Kumar Jha allowed an application for bail. The petitioner, accused in a Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act case, produced no liquor and was only a witness to fleeing. The court directed bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC, upon surrender within four weeks.

Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68464 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2019 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NAGENDRA YADAV @ NAGENDRA SINGH S/o Lalan Yadav R/o villageBichhiaon, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dharmesh Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 07-11-2019 Heard both sides.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sandesh P.S. Case No.178 of 2019 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The informant alleged that he went to raid a place after having received secret information that somebody had kept liquor. The informant further alleged that some persons found fleeing away from that place and on search, 105 liters country made liquor was recovered.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the case on the basis of the disclosure made by Choukidar that the petitioner was also found fleeing away from the place of occurrence.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68464 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/2

¶18

Similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge 4^th , Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No.178 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶20

Saurabh/-

¶21

U T

Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ambika Dutta @ Chhotu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Baidyanath Mukhiya Vs State of Bihar

Ram Ayodhya Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Bhagwan Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Bihar