Single Judge orally dismissed anticipatory bail petition, noting FIR lapsed to 2015 with no current arrest apprehension. Court allowed regular bail surrender consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68287 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-658 Year-2015 Thana- TURKAULIYA DistrictEast Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 25-02-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68287 of 2018(3) dt.25-02-2019 2/2
been heard.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners apprehending arrest in a long-pending case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harihar Manjhi
Basudeo Manjhi
Gagandeo Manjhi
Hari Kishun Manjhi
Rudal Manjhi
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
