Allowed

Harprit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2019CR. MISC./68135/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in Criminal Miscellaneous No.68135 of 2018, allowed the petitioner's application for regular bail in a cheating and forgery case arising out of the recovery of illicit liquor from a truck where the petitioner was allegedly caught at the spot as a khalasi.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Harprit Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68135 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harprit Singh Son of Manhendar Singh, Resident of Village- Tarantaran Nankeshar Colony, P.S. District- Tarantaran Panjab.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 21-01-2019

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajauli PS case no. 190 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The allegation is regarding recovery of a huge quantity of illicit liquor from a truck and the petitioner is said to have been caught from the spot.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly, the petitioner is the khalasi of the truck, hence he had no knowledge about the alleged liquor being carried in the truck and the truck also does not belong to the petitioner herein. It is further submitted that the petitioner has a clean

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68135 of 2018(5) dt.21-01-2019 2/2

¶18

antecedent and is languishing in custody since 19.06.2018.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Rajauli PS case no. 190 of 2018.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

rinkee/-

¶23

U T

Harprit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harprit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sajid Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Harihar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Baitha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Siyaram Yadav, Vs The State Of Bihar

Naresh Prasad Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.