Allowed

Atikulla Hossain v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2019CR. MISC./66372/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in PS. Case No. 35/2016 under Sections 406, 408, 420 IPC. The court noted the absence of specific allegations against the petitioner in the complaint. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 alongside two sureties of the same amount and surrendering within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge.

Atikulla Hossain Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66372 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2016 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ATIKULLA HOSSAIN Son of Hazarat Ali Resident of village- Gyaspur, P.S.English Bazar, District- Malda (West Bengal).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 11-12-2019 Heard both sides.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ishaqchak P.S. Case No.35 of 2016 registered under Sections 406, 408, 420, 467, 468, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The informant filed complaint case on the basis of which present F.I.R. was lodged. The informant arrayed the petitioner as an accused in serial no.5 but in the entire body of the complaint, the informant did not make any sorts of allegation against the petitioner either for persuading the informant to deposit money in the company or the petitioner was entrusted with any work or the petitioner did any work in the company. It is submitted that petitioner resigned and accused no.1 who was the Managing Director of the company gave the petitioner no dues certificate. Accused No.1 is Managing

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66372 of 2019(3) dt.11-12-2019 2/2

¶15

Director of the company and it was he who misappropriated the deposited money of the informant and others in the company.

¶16

The learned A.P.P. could not be able to show any material against the petitioner.

¶17

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in connection with Ishaqchak P.S. Case No.35 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

Saurabh/-

¶20

U T

Atikulla Hossain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atikulla Hossain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranju Devi @ Ranju Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Kant Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Indradev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mogal Rai @ Mangal Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Achhelal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vikky Das Vs The State of Bihar