Allowed

Ram Murat Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Nov 2019CR. MISC./65562/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners filed a prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with a cheque bounce case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The Court granted anticipatory bail subject to deposit of monetary amount and furnishing of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs.15,000/- and furnishing of a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties.

Ram Murat Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65562 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2019 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Murat Ram, aged about 55 years, Male, S/o Late Dwarika Ram, R/o village- Rasulpur Karmahari, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bachan Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 14-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 323 of 2019/ Excise Reg. No.475 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is recovery of 3 liters 420 ml. of wine from the house. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the house does not belong to the petitioner and there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶14

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65562 of 2019(2) dt.14-11-2019 2/2

¶16

deposit of Rs.15,000/- in the court below and on deposit of the aforesaid amount, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, the court below shall release him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.IV cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Bhabua (Kaimur) in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 323 of 2019/ Excise Reg. No.475 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶17

Such deposit of Rs.15,000/- shall abide by the outcome of the criminal case.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

Nasimul/-

¶20

U T

Ram Murat Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Murat Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sewak Paswan @ Ram Sewak Vs The State of Bihar

Muso Sah @ Musai Sah @ Musay Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Kishnath Sah Gond @ Kishnath Gorh Vs The State of Bihar