Dismissed

Ramakant Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2019CR. MISC./6491/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail in a 1993 FIR involving murder and rioting. The Court denied immediate relief, directed the petitioner to surrender for regular bail proceedings, and dismissed the application.

What did the court decide?

The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed; the petitioner was directed to surrender and seek regular bail.

Ramakant Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6491 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-1993 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramakant Tiwary S/o Rambyash Tiwary Resident of Village- Itaunhan, P.SNawanagar, (Sonbarsa O.P) District- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Deo Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 02-04-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in

¶12

connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 37 of 1993, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 448 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner and other accused persons is that they came variously armed and allegation against one other co-accused person is of firing. Case is of the year 1993 and the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶14

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, he was present at that time in his working place and certificate to that place has also been granted by the Commandant and there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who opposed the prayer for

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6491 of 2019(4) dt.02-04-2019 2/2

¶17

anticipatory bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is coming after 26 years and he is named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, rather he should surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit, without being prejudice by order of this Court.

¶19

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

Amjad/-

¶22

U T

Ramakant Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramakant Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Kumar Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rakesh Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Lulha @ Ajay Gope Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu @ Tauquir Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Yadav and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Choubey @ Ashok Choubey and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.