Allowed

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Oct 2019CR. MISC./64333/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail. He is enlarged on bail if he surrenders within six weeks, subject to surety and conditions of Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties if arrested or surrenders within six weeks from today, subject to conditions of S. 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64333 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2019 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH YADAV @ MUKESH KUMAR YADAV Son of Binda Prasad Yadav @ Binda Rai Resident of Village - Fulwari Majhariya, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner.

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 23-10-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No.38 of 2019 registered under Sections 379, 413 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The accusation is that on receiving the information about the presence of one person standing with stolen motorcycle at Bhawnari Tower Chowk, the informant along with other police personnel reached there and saw a person standing with motorcycle. On seeing the police party, that person tried to flee away after starting his motorcycle but he was apprehended, who disclosed his name as Brajesh Kumar, On making demand of the paper regarding the said motorcycle, he disclosed that the said motorcycle is stolen one and the same was stolen by him with the help of his associates, namely,

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64333 of 2019(2) dt.23-10-2019 2/2

¶15

Sonu Yadav and Mukesh Yadav (petitioner).

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that the petitioner was not present at the place from where Brajesh Kumar is said to be apprehended with the stolen motorcycle. In fact, the apprehended accused Brajesh Kumar is the co-villager of this petitioner and, due to that reason, he also disclosed the name of the petitioner as his associate indulged in stealing the motorcycle. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No.38 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶19

P.S./-

¶20

U T

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Prakash Shandilya @ Aman Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Rabidas Vs The State of Bihar

Ramayan Bind Vs The State of Bihar