Dismissed

Indal Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Oct 2019CR. MISC./62802/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. Despite the petitioner's name appearing only in a co-accused's confessional statement with no other evidence, the judge refused bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender to seek regular bail to allow for custodial interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed; the petitioner was directed to surrender to seek regular bail.

Indal Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62802 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2011 Thana- GHOSWARI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Indal Ram, S/o Lat Sairu Ram, Resident of Naya Isua, P.S.- Sarmera, DistrictNalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 15-10-2019

¶11

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in

¶12

connection with Ghoshwari P. S. Case No. 06 of 2011, disclosing offences under Sections 395 & 397 of IPC.

¶13

As per F.I.R. 7-8 miscreants intercepted the truck of the informant, taken away Rs.5000/-, mobile phone and they have also looted away on the truck. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Later on, his name transpires on the confessional statement of the co-accused.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the occurrence is of the year 2011 and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against this petitioner.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that unless the petitioner appears the TIP may be conducted and as such, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62802 of 2019(2) dt.15-10-2019 2/2

¶17

Having heard both sides, in view of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the petitioner may surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail.

¶18

With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

Sunil Shukla/-

¶21

U T

Indal Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indal Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Rai @ Pawan Kumar @ Chinku Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mustafa Vs the State of Bihar

Surendra Prajapati @ Surendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Yadav @ Sri Krishna Singh Vs The State of Bihar