Allowed

Md. Hashim v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Nov 2019CR. MISC./62613/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application by the father-in-law of a victim in a dowry harassment case, the High Court observed that the medical exam showed no injury on the victim. The court granted bail on furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West at Muzaffarpur.

Md. Hashim Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62613 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2019 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Hashim, aged about 52 years, Son of Md. Ainul Mian @ Ainul Hak, Resident of Village - Aima Bishunpur @ Bishunpur, P.S.- Karja, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Saheb Jan Mian, Son of Rajjak Mian, Resident of Village - Bhatauna, P.S.Karja, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Neeraj Kumar Alias Sanidh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Dlilip Kumar No.1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 173 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498(A), 316/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

The case of the prosecution in short that the informant got married his daughter Shahnaz with Md. Shahnawaz on 09.07.2017 according to Muslim rites and rituals and in the marriage he gave gifts and cash as per his capacity. He has further stated that after marriage, his daughter live happily and thereafter she was assaulted and tortured and demanded Rs. One

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62613 of 2019(2) dt.04-11-2019 2/2

¶15

lac as dowry and lastly they ousted her from the house due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant’s daughter was examined by the doctory who did not find any external or internal injury on the person of informant’s daughter which appears from paragraph-22 of the case diary. The petitioner is in jail custody since 04.07.2019. Petitioner is the father-in-law of the informant’s daughter.

¶17

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West at Muzaffarpur in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 173 of 2019.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

Nasimul/-

Md. Hashim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Hashim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Chitrasen Pandit @ Vinay Vs the State of Bihar

Surendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Kashi Bind @ Kashinath Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Rai @ Suraj @ Suraja Vs The State of Bihar