and abuse and assault the informant and also taunt her for giving birth to two girls. Learned counsel submitted that from the plain reading of the complaint, the entire story appears to be totally unnatural and even absurd. It was submitted that the opposite party no. 2 living in the town of Sasaram would call the petitioners who are living far away in their village at Dihra under police station Dinara for giving Rs. 3,50,000/- to them for safe keeping without the petitioners taking the money or giving it to the person for whom it had been withdrawn from the Bank, is difficult to believe. Learned counsel submitted that in the background of strained relationship between the husband and the wife, the fact that the petitioners would come at the calling of the opposite party no. 2 and further that the opposite party no. 2 would give a such huge amount to them is totally unbelievable. Learned counsel further submitted that the present complaint case being filed only to counter the case filed by the wife of the opposite party no. 2 would be apparent from the fact that in the complaint, the opposite party no. 2 has stated that the petitioners had threatened that if the opposite party no. 2 did not give him the remaining amount, they would get a case under the Dowry Act lodged against him. Learned counsel submitted that the wife of the opposite party no. 2 had lodged the case in Sasaram Town P.S., as, at the relevant
