Allowed

Gorelal Rawani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Aug 2019CR. MISC./6122/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order in a criminal bail petition. The petitioner, charged with offenses under the IPC, Arms Act, and E.S. Act involving explosives, sought release from custody. The Court had to decide the bail application and determine the conditions for release.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Additional Sessions Judge III, Aurangabad.

Gorelal Rawani Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6122 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2014 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gorelal Rawani S/o Chini Ram, R/o village- Jhilmil P.S.- Tikari, DistrictGaya (Bihar)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lal Bahadur Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 20-08-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B), 26, 35 of Arms Act and ¾ of E.S. Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

¶16

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioner were made planning to commit explosion in Mauza Teldiha and huge quantity of explosive substances, bomb, live cartdiges, S.L.R. and A.K. 47 are recovered.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody 1.6.2018. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No arms is said to

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6122 of 2019(6) dt.20-08-2019 2/2

¶19

have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Other co-accused has been granted bail vide Cr.Misc.No.44480 of 2018. It is further submitted that the petitioner will co-operate during trial.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Aurangabad in connection with S.Tr. No.422 of 2018 arising out of Madanpur P.S. case No.123 of 2014.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

Narendra/-

¶24

U T

Gorelal Rawani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gorelal Rawani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dhamendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Khurshid Vs the State of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Prasad Vs the State of Bihar through the Vigilance

Rajendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Das Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav @ Kariya Yadav Vs The State of Bihar