Allowed

Dilkhush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2019CR. MISC./60331/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for bail in a dowry death case, the Patna High Court accepted the petitioner's submission that the informant implicated the family on suspicion without specific details. The court released the petitioners on bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Begusarai, subject to stated cond

Dilkhush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 60331 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2018 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DILKHUSH KUMAR S/o Ajay singh Resident of Village Babhangama, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai.

¶5

Ajay Singh @ Barku Singh S/O Late Kishori Singh Resident of Village Babhangama, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shree Niwas Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 11-12-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Petitioners are Devar and father-in-law respectively of the victim. It is submitted that the informant (mother-in-law of victim) has implicated the entire family members merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no specific details as to what offence has been committed by these two petitioners and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent. Petitioners are in custody since 20.06.2019.

¶16

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60331 of 2019(3) dt.11-12-2019 2/2

¶18

Considering the rival submissions, this Court is inclined to accept the submission of petitioner’s counsel.

¶19

Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Begusarai in Birpur Police Station Case No 131 of 2018 subject to the following conditions:

¶20

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners.

¶21

(2) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶23

M.E.H. /-

¶24

U T

Dilkhush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilkhush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Bablu Miyan @ Bablu Miayan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bal Kunwar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Phulendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manu Rai @ Manu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Daya Shankar Kumar @ Daya Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar