In an anticipatory bail petition, the High Court refused bail to the petitioner due to the gravity of the offences involving sexual misconduct and cheating. The court observed the evidence and dismissed the petition.
Anticipatory bail petition dismissed; petitioner apprehends arrest under multiple IPC sections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59356 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2019 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj
======================================================
MD. AGAZ @ MD. SHAMSH AGAZ Son of Alauddin @ Md. Alauddin Resident of Village - Handi Pokhar, P.S.- Dighalbank, District - Kishanganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 16-11-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59356 of 2019(3) dt.16-11-2019 2/2
the informant’s daughter were classmates. The petitioner claims
clean antecedents.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 420, 354C, 509 of the IPC and Section 67 of the I.T. Act.
Md. Agaz @ Md. Shams Agaz
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
