Allowed

Pramod Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Nov 2019CR. MISC./58946/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The court released the petitioner on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., noting the petitioner had no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount and compliance with Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Pramod Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58946 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2019 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pramod Sah, Son of Narayan Sah, Resident of Village - Kharua, P.S.Kundwachainpur, District - East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 16-11-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶11

State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC.

¶13

The prosecution case is that the petitioner took Rs. 1.5 lac from the petitioner on assurance to provide employment in Government Elementary, School, but neither the employment was provided to the petitioner, nor the money was returned.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no proof with regard to making payment to the petitioner. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58946 of 2019(4) dt.16-11-2019 2/2

¶16

Learned APP, after going through the case diary, submits that the petitioner had given receiving of money on stamp paper.

¶17

Considering the fact that the informant wanted to get employment through illegal means, coupled with the statement made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sikarhana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶18

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

Amrendra/-

¶20

U T

Pramod Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Kumar Sethi Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Gangdeyal Yadav @ Gangdeyal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Sibo Chaudhary @ Sipo Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Ravidas Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Rajbansi Vs The State of Bihar