Allowed

Md. Jasim Ansari @ Md. Jassim Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Sept 2019CR. MISC./57927/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The court imposes a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and specific conditions regarding the petitioner's presence and conduct during the trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail after furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties subject to special conditions including physical presence in court and cooperation with investigation.

Md. Jasim Ansari @ Md. Jassim Ansari Vs The… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57927 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. JASIM ANSARI @ MD. JASSIM ANSARI Son of Nasim Ansari Resident of Village- Kastoli Samsa, Police Station- Mansoorchak, DistrictBegusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Rahmatullah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.J.K.Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 408, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. (Ratanpur O.P.) Case No. 57 of 2018.

¶12

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation that he along with two other co-accused persons have collected money on behalf of TVS Credit Services Limited but not deposited the same with the company and in respect of which complaints have been received from a few persons as enumerated in the FIR. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is contrary to the averments made in the FIR that the accused persons were working as Field Collection Executive for two years, the petitioner has merely worked for the company during the period 24.06.2016 to 07.06.2017 (less than one year) as evident from the said company’s letter dated 25.10.2017 (Annexure-2). It is further stated that one of the so-called complainants, Md. Nayeem Akhtar has stated on affidavit that he does not know the petitioner nor had paid any money to him. It is further stated that after the petitioner submitted

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57927 of 2019(2) dt.13-09-2019 2/2

¶14

his resignation on 07.06.2017, the company remitted an arrear amount of Rs. 1,379/- to the account of the petitioner after institution of the FIR, in view of which the accusations against the petitioner are highly improbable. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶15

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. (Ratanpur O.P.) Case No. 57 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶16

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶17

ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶18

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶19

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶20

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶21

Chandran/-

¶22

U T

Md. Jasim Ansari @ Md. Jassim Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Jasim Ansari @ Md. Jassim Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasad Paswan @ Ram Prasad Paswan @ Ram Prasad Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Chaudhary @ Sanjay Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Kr. Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sanni Kumar @ Ashutosh @ Ashutosh Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonwa Devi @ Sunaina Devi Vs The State of Bihar