Allowed

Sanjeev Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Sept 2019CR. MISC./55917/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting anticipatory bail conditions to petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving charges of affray, culpable homicide, and attempt to murder under IPC and Arms Act.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions laid under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Sanjeev Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55917 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2019 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJEEV SINGH @ SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH Son of Shri Bhuteshwar singh Resident of Village- Bind Wara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

¶5

Gabbar Singh Son of Shri Sanjeev Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Bind Wara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

¶6

Bikki Singh @ Bikky Singh Son of Shri Rabindra Singh Resident of Village- Bind Wara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prakash Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 03-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 353, 225, 307, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 158/2019, G.R.No. 1677 of 2019.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the FIR is against as many as 23 named accused persons. The petitioners merely happened to be in the vicinity and the accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioners. There is one day’s delay in institution of the FIR on 27.06.2019 for the alleged occurrence of 26.06.2019. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

¶15

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners’ be

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55917 of 2019(2) dt.03-09-2019 2/2

¶17

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Munger, in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 158/2019, G.R.No. 1677 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶18

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶19

ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶22

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶23

Chandran/-

¶24

U T

Sanjeev Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tetari Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Raj Kishore Purbe @ Raj Kishore Purvey Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar

Bhagirath Mistri @Bhagirath Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Singh Vs The State of Bihar