This High Court order dismisses an anticipatory bail petition filed by five petitioners. The court rejected the plea citing nature of accusations, gravity of offences, injury report of the informant, and criminal antecedents of some petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55413 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv Mr.Nilesh Kumar Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the State : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Chandan Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 02-09-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55413 of 2019(2) dt.02-09-2019 2/2
general and omnibus in nature without any specific assault attributed individually. The petitioner nos. 1 and 3 claim clean antecedents while petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 5 are accused in prior cases.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of offences under various sections of the IPC and Arms Act.
Sanjeev Singh
Rupesh Singh
Nikesh Kumar
Rishi Singh
Krishna Mohan Singh
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
