Allowed

Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Excise Department, Patna, Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC1 May 2019CR. MISC./52700/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner applied to replace a bank guarantee with a sale deed of immovable property as surety for the release of a seized vehicle in connection with a criminal proceeding.

What did the court decide?

The authority concerned shall accept the sale deed of immovable property as surety for the release of the vehicle along with an affidavit.

Suresh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar Through The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52700 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2041 of 2017

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Suresh Ram, Son of Late Khagpati Ram, Resident of Village - Patardih, P.S. Jamua, District - Giridih Jharkhand.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Excise Department, Patna, Bihar

¶10

The District Magistrate, Nawada.

¶11

The Superintendent of Police Nawada.

¶12

The S.I., Arbind Kumar S.H.O. Dhamaul, P.S.- Nawada.

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Pankaj ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶18

7 01-05-2019 Heard the parties.

¶19

This application is for modification of order dated 22.11.2017 passed in Cr.W.J.C. No. 2041 of 2017 whereby this Court had directed release of the seized vehicle of the petitioner vide Maruti Van bearing registration no. JH-11P5204 in connection with Pakribarawan (Dhamaul) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 on condition of petitioner furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.4,00,000/- (rupees four lacs).

¶20

Submission is that the petitioner is not capable to furnish bank guarantee, however, the petitioner is ready to furnish sale deed of immovable property of the equal value.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52700 of 2018(7) dt.01-05-2019 2/2

¶22

Petitioner has produced a sale deed in the name of Pokhan Ram, Bhim Lal Ram and Khagpati Ram. Khagpati Ram was father of the petitioner and two other purchasers Pokhan Ram and Bhim Lal Ram were uncles who died unmarried. Father of the petitioner also died leaving the petitioner as only heir. The aforesaid fact has come in the supplementary affidavit of the petitioner.

¶23

In the circumstance, prayer for modification is

¶24

allowed.

¶25

The authority concerned shall accept the sale deed of immovable property as surety for release of the vehicle aforesaid along with affidavit of the petitioner that he would not sale the aforesaid land to any one till original sale deed is received back by the petitioner after conclusion of the proceeding.

¶26

Accordingly, this application stands allowed.

¶27

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶28

Kundan/-

¶29

U T

Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Excise Department, Patna, Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Excise Department, Patna, Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Noor Alam @ Kinnu Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Yadav @ Gobind Jee Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Mohammad Shabir @ Jaheed @ Tanveer @ Shabir Vs The State Of Bihar

Sk. Neshar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ratnesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar