Allowed

Jai Jai Ram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Aug 2019CR. MISC./51357/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving false implication and dispute over Gram Kutchery secretary appointment. The order conditions release on bail bond and adherence to statutory terms if arrested or surrendering within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on strengthening of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to be furnished to the CJM, Khagaria.

Jai Jai Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51357 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JAI JAI RAM YADAV S/o Bhikhari Prasad Yadav @ Bhikari Yadav Resident of Village- Khutiya, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-08-2019

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mansi P.S.Case No. 29 of 2019 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner, as per FIR, is that informant had gone to join as Secretary, Gram Kutchery and met Sarpanch, Smt. Geeta Devi, but both the Sarpanch and her husband, who is petitioner here, did not allow the informant to join as Secretary, Gram Kutchery and told the informant that confirmation from Block Development Officer did not come.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case based upon misconceived prosecution inasmuch as petitioner is not the competent authority to take joining of the informant and in fact, wife of the petitioner is Sarpanch, who is competent and

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51357 of 2019(2) dt.17-08-2019 2/2

¶16

petitioner has been dragged in this case along with his wife also. Learned counsel further submits that wife of the petitioner i.e. Sarpanch, has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc. No. 38094 of 2019.

¶17

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that Sarpanch i.e., wife of the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and dispute relating to joining of the petitioner as Secretary , Gram Kutchery , as such I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S.Case No. 29 of 2019; subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶19

sujit/-

¶20

U T

Jai Jai Ram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Jai Ram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhat Kumar @ Bauwa Pandit Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Arvind Kumar Singh @ Arvind Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Nawal Kishore Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Indal Ram @ Pandit Ji @ Indal Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar