Allowed

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2019CR. MISC./48089/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order granting anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault and attempted murder. Bail conditioned furnishing bonds and sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for twelve weeks, subject to CrPC Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate within twelve weeks, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. condi

Ankit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48089 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2019 Thana- JAMHOR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ankit Kumar Son of Anil Singh Resident of village - Satuahi, P.S.- Jamhore, Dist.- Aurangabad

¶5

Anil Singh Son of Suresh Singh Resident of village - Satuahi, P.S.- Jamhore, Dist.- Aurangabad

¶6

Mritunjay Singh Son of Suresh Singh Resident of village - Satuahi, P.S.Jamhore, Dist.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 01-08-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307 and 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The prosecution case is that on 26.05.2019 while the informant Santwant Kumar was going to his house by a motorcycle when co-villagers and the petitioners dashed him. On protest being made, they assaulted the informant with an iron rod.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that due to old enmity, the accusation has been levelled and the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48089 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2019 2/2

¶19

injury has been found to be simple in nature. It is further submitted that there is a counter version of the occurrence being Jamhore P.S. Case No. 64 of 2019 and for the occurrence of 26.05.2019 the FIR was registered on 27.05.2019 at 7.15 P.M. Though, the petitioners are accused in one another case of trivial nature.

¶20

Learned APP submits that the petitioners are named in

¶21

the FIR.

¶22

Considering the simple nature of injury caused and there being counter version of the occurrence also, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 63 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶24

DKS/-

¶25

U T

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baleshwar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Vakil Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shibu Paswan @ Vishunu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Singh @ Rajnish Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Chauhan @ Mithlesh Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar