Allowed

Ajit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2019CR. MISC./4795/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for over nine months in a case involving cheating and theft triable by a Magistrate, allowing him to be released on furnishing a bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the CMJ, Madhubani.

Ajit Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4795 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2018 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajit Kumar Sah Son of Mahesh Sah Resident of Village - Phuhari, P.S. - Rahika, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rishikesh Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 12-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The prosecution case in short is that having exchanged the ATM Card of the informant, the accused person withdrew Rs. 21,000/- from the account of informant.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 09-07-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has remained in custody for more than 9 months. The offence is triable by Magistrate. There is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4795 of 2019(3) dt.12-04-2019 2/2

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 57 of 2018.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

A.K.V.//- U T

Ajit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daroga Singh @ Daroga Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Rai @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Nilesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ahmad @ Md. Ahmad @ Babli Vs The State Of Bihar

Indradeo Vishwakarma @ Pintu Vs the State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar