In a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a police complaint, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn since the petitioner had died and no substitution was possible following precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4610 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1728 Year-2013 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Jyoti Devi wife of Vimal Kishore Jaiswal, daughter of Late Khaheru Chaudhary, at present residence of Village- Bairgania, Lohapatti, Main Road, Ward No. 14, Police Station- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
4 21-06-2019 Petitioner is dead. In the background of principle decided by the Division Bench in Mridula Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Anr. passed in Cr. Misc. No.41386/2017, no substitution could be and so, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mridula Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Anr.Referred¶12
Mridula Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Jyoti Devi
The State Of Bihar
Vimal Kishore Jaiswal
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
