This is an oral order dismissing a withdrawn criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a police station case. The court referred to an Apex Court observation before allowing the withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4463 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-956 Year-2015 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Shyam Bihari Singh
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
As observed by the Apex Court in Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander & Anr. r eported in (2012) 9 SCC 460 wherein at para-17, it has been observed that the time of framing of charge the mode consideration of the materials happens to be weaker than prima facie case, in the aforesaid background the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of instant petition.
As such dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander & Anr.Referred¶17
Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander & Anr. (2012) 9 SCC 460 · Who else cites this
Nand Kishore Thakur
Arbind Thakur
The State Of Bihar
Arunjay Thakur
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
