The High Court at Patna, in Criminal Misc. No.4462 of 2017, dismissed a petition challenging an order dated 23.10.1998. The court held the petition was devoid of merit on account of the petitioners' non-appearance during the valuation of proceedings.
Petition rejected as it is devoid of merit due to petitioners' non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4462 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-799 Year-1998 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
ORAL ORDER
Gone through the order impugned which happens to be dated 23.10.1998 and virtually the non-appearance of the petitioners is reason for challenging the same after elapse of such long period. However, the nature of the order impugned speaks about proper appreciation of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4462 of 2017(3) dt.16-05-2019 2/2
Accordingly, instant petition is found devoid of merit
and is accordingly rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the order dated 23.10.1998 deserves allowability.
Shankar Mandal and others
The State Of Bihar
Motilal Rai
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
