Complaint Case no.1139 of 2013 filed by the petitioner no.2 alleging that the land which was sold to opposite party no.2 was in the share of the petitioners and to coerce them and force them not to pursue the matter, the present complaint case has been filed. It was submitted that in view of the wrongful transfer of the land of the petitioners to the opposite party no.2, by the brother of the petitioner no.2, Title Suit No.512 of 2014 is also pending in the Court of Sub Judge 1st Sasaram which has been filed by petitioner no.2 and in which opposite party no.2 is also a defendant. Learned counsel submitted that on the plain reading of the complaint, it is apparent that all allegations are frivolous and cosmetic only to make out a grave case, but the same stand demolished in view of the fact that at the 4.00 P.M., in a busy locality, there being no explanation as what resistance the opposite party no.2 offered or why the neighbours did not come and prevent the incident being mentioned in the complaint, clearly the occurrence itself is fictitious and fabricated. It was further submitted that in the background of past enmity, especially when the petitioner no.1 is a practicing Advocate in the local Civil Court and the petitioner no.2 is a practicing MBBS Doctor in Jamshedpur, the allegation of extortion is absolutely unbelievable.
