Allowed

Nasim Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2019CR. MISC./41101/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order granting anticipatory bail to Nasim Alam in a case registered under sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the IPC for alleged land fraud. Bail allowed subject to bond, sureties, and conditions to avoid tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.

Nasim Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41101 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-666 Year-2018 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

NASIM ALAM Son of Pheku Khan, Resident of Village- Sirisiya Mathiya, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-07-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No. 666 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation has been made that wrongly 9 katha land of the informant has been transacted/executed in which the petitioner is a witness.

¶14

Looking to the nature of allegation, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41101 of 2019(2) dt.04-07-2019 2/2

¶16

bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No. 666 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶17

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶18

Mahesh/-

¶19

U T

Nasim Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasim Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rinku Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Chandra Sharma @ Ram Chandra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ramjee Prasad Vs Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

N. K. Singh @ Nand Kishore Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Yadav Vs the State of Bihar